Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

What I would like is...a better way of handling alternative routes


Author
Message
Ramscroft
Ramscroft
Too Much Forum (2K reputation)Too Much Forum (2K reputation)Too Much Forum (2K reputation)Too Much Forum (2K reputation)Too Much Forum (2K reputation)Too Much Forum (2K reputation)Too Much Forum (2K reputation)Too Much Forum (2K reputation)Too Much Forum (2K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13, Visits: 104
I often plan a long route outside controlled airspace but have in mind short cuts through controlled airspace if granted. An example would be Southend to Nuthamptead. The long route is DCT LAM DCT BPK DCT. The short route goes direct via the Stansted overhead, if Essex radar let me.

What I would like to be able to do is to put both routes in my plan (and on my plog), so that I'm prepared for either. This is similar to the way alternate destinations are handled, a leg in the route that you might or might not fly, but obviously in the middle of a route instead of just at the end.

I would also prefer to have the ability to plan the route to the alternate. As it is now, it is just a straight line to the alternate but that may cross controlled airspace. It would be better if it were possible to put additional weigh points in the route to the alternate.

Ray
Replies
adhawkins
adhawkins
Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 274, Visits: 2.5K
I've been thinking about this recently. Planning a flight to Caernarfon I ended up with three routes planned to handle various weather conditions (one straight over the mountains, one to the South over high ish ground, and one to the North over lower ground).

Would have been nice to be able to have all of these in one route somehow...

Andy
ckurz7000
ckurz7000
Too Much Forum (68K reputation)Too Much Forum (68K reputation)Too Much Forum (68K reputation)Too Much Forum (68K reputation)Too Much Forum (68K reputation)Too Much Forum (68K reputation)Too Much Forum (68K reputation)Too Much Forum (68K reputation)Too Much Forum (68K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 538, Visits: 2.2K
Would have been nice to be able to have all of these in one route somehow


Yes, the "somehow" is the catch. It's easy to pile on new features while cluttering the user interface, losing sight of the program's purpose and generally confusing the user.

A good software designer has to decide which feature truly adds value to his program. So far the SD team have evolved the program admirably, finding ways to integrate useful functionality in an intuitive way.

Keep up the good work, guys! -- Chris.
Edited 4/15/2013 4:47:07 PM by ckurz7000
adhawkins
adhawkins
Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)Too Much Forum (30K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 274, Visits: 2.5K
Agree absolutely. I'm a software engineer myself so know how difficult it is to keep a balance between adding bells and whistles and not making the software overly complex for the user. Tricky one.

Andy
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search